From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:22:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20130205132241.GH4827@pd.tnic> References: <20130205091532.GA4827@pd.tnic> <20130205102721.GB4827@pd.tnic> <20130205110407.GC4827@pd.tnic> <20130205111918.GD4827@pd.tnic> <20130205113242.GF4827@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:52410 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754083Ab3BENWo (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:22:44 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, Charles Garcia-Tobin On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:54:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:q > This indication isn't enough. On a single image solution, we need to > identify the system which needs support for multiple policies and i > still feel we need that variable type indication :) If the image is going to run also on systems which support only a single policy, then I guess you can make it a bool, stuff it in struct cpufreq_policy and ifdef around it. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --