From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 19:44:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20130205184438.GL4827@pd.tnic> References: <20130204123221.GA22340@pd.tnic> <20130204130403.GD13909@pd.tnic> <20130204133648.GE13909@pd.tnic> <80D6EFE2711DED4189C7C8F0430BFEA86D23D6A80E@BUNGLE.Emea.Arm.com> <20130205113950.GG4827@pd.tnic> <80D6EFE2711DED4189C7C8F0430BFEA86D23DFF1B1@BUNGLE.Emea.Arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80D6EFE2711DED4189C7C8F0430BFEA86D23DFF1B1@BUNGLE.Emea.Arm.com> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Charles Garcia-Tobin Cc: Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org" , Robin Randhawa , Steve Bannister , Liviu Dudau List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 06:38:07PM +0000, Charles Garcia-Tobin wrote: > Later. Whatever you'd like to call it, but essentially a set of cpus, > as linux understands them, that are logically related by the fact that > you'd like to be able to use the same tuning policy and same governor > across all of them. Right, policy will be applied to the whole set, yes, but can you imagine that per-core settings could also make sense at some point? Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --