From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/4] block layer runtime pm Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:19:34 +0800 Message-ID: <20130221091934.GA8612@aaronlu.sh.intel.com> References: <1361340717-8991-1-git-send-email-aaron.lu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Stern , Jens Axboe , James Bottomley Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Aaron Lu , Shane Huang List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:43:50AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Aaron Lu wrote: > > > In August 2010, Jens and Alan discussed about "Runtime PM and the block > > layer". http://marc.info/?t=128259108400001&r=1&w=2 > > And then Alan has given a detailed implementation guide: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=133727953625963&w=2 > > > v10: > > - Add link of Alan Stern's ideas on block layer runtime PM to patch 2 > > and 3's changelog; > > - Add back code to schdule device suspend if scsi driver return -EBUSY. > > This all looks okay now. You can add > > Acked-by: Alan Stern > > to each of the patches. Great, thanks a lot for your kind help. Hi James, Can I have your ack for patch 1 and 4? And Jens, Do you have any comments for this series? Thanks, Aaron