From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] cpufreq: AMD "frequency sensitivity feedback" powersave bias for ondemand governor Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 23:01:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20130402210124.GI17675@pd.tnic> References: <1364926304-1799-1-git-send-email-jacob.shin@amd.com> <20130402192352.GC17675@pd.tnic> <20130402200337.GA17919@jshin-Toonie> <2932884.BNCEuERbdR@skinner.arch.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2932884.BNCEuERbdR@skinner.arch.suse.de> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Jacob Shin , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:51:51PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > Yep, if you want anyone to make use of this, it should better get > embedded in more general, at least general ondemand code. Yeah, it all sounds like we want to enable this by default on systems which support it. Maybe with an off-switch for people who want plain ondemand decisions. The remaining systems with ripped out powersave_bias would get plain ondemand governor decisions. Provided, of course, nobody uses powersave_bias and the functionality doesn't make any sense anyway. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --