From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq:boost:Kconfig: Enable boost support at Kconfig
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:42:02 +0200
Message-ID: <20130610154202.34b634b7@amdc308.digital.local>
References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
 <1370502472-7249-6-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
 <20130606155815.GB21272@pd.tnic>
 <20130610152027.3133d1ab@amdc308.digital.local>
 <CAKohponR3HtHMkvCCdzmAS+MMe0CawRYr-ome=SO80nLVaWbeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mailout4.samsung.com ([203.254.224.34]:26046 "EHLO
	mailout4.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752392Ab3FJNmu (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:42:50 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAKohponR3HtHMkvCCdzmAS+MMe0CawRYr-ome=SO80nLVaWbeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocky" <rjw@sisk.pl>, "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>, Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@samsung.com>, Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@linaro.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

Hi Viresh,

> On 10 June 2013 18:50, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:07:52AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >> > Enable/disable support for BOOST. New flag - CPU_FREQ_BOOST has
> >> > been defined for that.
> >>
> >> What's the reason for this? Why would you want to not compile-in
> >> the boosting code?
> >
> > I think that this flag could be removed and the "boost" could be
> > compiled-in permanently.
> >
> > Viresh, what is your opinion?
> 
> Yes, Borislav is correct. I haven't actually reviewed these last
> patches as I saw lots of issues with first one :)

Ok, thanks :-)

-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group