From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukasz Majewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:31:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20130628093105.1fa62005@amdc308.digital.local> References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1371661969-7660-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1371661969-7660-3-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <20130627175546.677d9f9b@amdc308.digital.local> <20130628084939.1921a717@amdc308.digital.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocky" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Vincent Guittot , Jonghwa Lee , Myungjoo Ham , linux-kernel , Lukasz Majewski , Andre Przywara , Daniel Lezcano , Kukjin Kim , Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:21:21 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 28 June 2013 12:19, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > No, I will use: > > > > if (boost_enabled != state) { > > write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); > > boost_enabled = state; > > > > ret = cpufreq_driver->enable_boost(state); > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ only one callback call > > if (ret) > > boost_enabled = 0; > > > > write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); > > > > if (ret) > > pr_err("%s: BOOST cannot enable (%d)\n", > > __func__, ret); > > } > > > > and @ cpufreq_register_driver() I will add following line: > > > > if (!cpufreq_driver->enable_boost) > > cpufreq_driver->enable_boost = &cpufreq_boost_enable_sw; > > > > When cpufreq driver doesn't define callback for enable_boost it > > will be filled with default SW cpufreq_boost_enable_sw callback. > > That's some smart code. Good. :) OK -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group