Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix runtime warnings on systems with shared core clocks

[Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 841 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 04:02:32PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 2 July 2013 15:59, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> > If you're forced to do stuff like that then don't include the patch in
> > the body of the e-mail, it just makes everything worse.  Not only is the
> > copy in the body of the e-mail broken but there's now two copies so
> > tools like git am get even more upset as they may potentially see some
> > of the hunks twice.

> I do it so that people can review it. I still believe its important.

If your patch is sent as a text/plain attachment most mail clients will
tend to do the right thing with replies, at least the good ones.  Or
just figure out a VPN or something to get round the firewall issues,
mobile broadband is often a good technique if there's no carry
restrictions (usually phones are allowed...).

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]