From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>,
"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/37] cpufreq: at32ap: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core too
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:44:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130814144449.GA9485@samfundet.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpo=n9o+EKkboc1hw7ms_NkNwbsJ4VvEA2cB0R7gUi-U94A@mail.gmail.com>
Around Wed 14 Aug 2013 20:07:44 +0530 or thereabout, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14 August 2013 20:05, Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> wrote:
>> Around Wed 14 Aug 2013 19:01:53 +0530 or thereabout, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
>>> this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.
>>>
>>> Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
>>> ->init().
>>
>> It would be easier to review if you add me to CC on the new APIs you
>> implement as well. Now I had to look up what the ->get() call did.
>
> I know my track record hasn't been impressive on this subject but I am
> sure I am following this since sometime now :)
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/14/285
Sorry, my bad, I actually had gotten it, it was just so too short to notice.
--
mvh
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-14 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-14 13:31 [PATCH 00/37] CPUFreq: set policy->cur in cpufreq core instead of Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH 01/37] cpufreq: call cpufreq_driver->get() after calling ->init() Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH 02/37] cpufreq: acpi: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core too Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH 03/37] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH 04/37] cpufreq: at32ap: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 14:35 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2013-08-14 14:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 14:44 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt [this message]
2013-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH 05/37] cpufreq: blackfin: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH 06/37] cpufreq: cpu0: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH 07/37] cpufreq: nforce2: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH 08/37] cpufreq: cris: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH 09/37] cpufreq: davinci: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH 10/37] cpufreq: dbx500: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 11/37] cpufreq: e_powersaver: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 12/37] cpufreq: elanfreq: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 13/37] cpufreq: exynos: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-18 10:50 ` amit daniel kachhap
2013-08-18 21:58 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 14/37] cpufreq: gx: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 15/37] cpufreq: ia64-acpi: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 16/37] cpufreq: imx6q: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 17/37] cpufreq: integrator: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 18/37] cpufreq: kirkwood: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 19/37] cpufreq: longhaul: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 20/37] cpufreq: loongson2: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 21/37] cpufreq: maple: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 22/37] cpufreq: omap: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 23/37] cpufreq: p4: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 24/37] cpufreq: pcc: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 25/37] cpufreq: pmac: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 26/37] cpufreq: powernow: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 27/37] cpufreq: ppc: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 28/37] cpufreq: pxa: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 29/37] cpufreq: s3c: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 30/37] cpufreq: s5pv210: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 31/37] cpufreq: sa11x0: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 32/37] cpufreq: sc520_freq: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 33/37] cpufreq: sh: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 34/37] cpufreq: spear: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 35/37] cpufreq: speedstep: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 36/37] cpufreq: tegra: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:32 ` [PATCH 37/37] cpufreq: unicore2: " Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130814144449.GA9485@samfundet.no \
--to=egtvedt@samfundet.no \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).