public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>,
	Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	rui.zhang@intel.com, Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	hpa@zytor.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] preempt: Take away preempt_enable_no_resched() from modules
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:54:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131120105457.04f6e51e@ultegra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131120162736.760865926@infradead.org>

On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:04:57 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> Discourage drivers/modules to be creative with preemption.
> 
> Sadly all is implemented in macros and inline so if they want to do
> evil they still can, but at least try and discourage some.
> 
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: lenb@kernel.org
> Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
> Cc: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com
> Cc: jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: hpa@zytor.com
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/preempt.h |   16 +++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- a/include/linux/preempt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
> @@ -64,7 +64,11 @@ do { \
>  } while (0)
>  
>  #else
> -#define preempt_enable() preempt_enable_no_resched()
> +#define preempt_enable() \
> +do { \
> +	barrier(); \
> +	preempt_count_dec(); \
> +} while (0)
>  #define preempt_check_resched() do { } while (0)
>  #endif
>  
> @@ -126,6 +130,16 @@ do { \
>  #define preempt_fold_need_resched() do { } while (0)
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef MODULE
> +/*
> + * Modules have no business playing preemption tricks.
> + */
> +#undef sched_preempt_enable_no_resched
> +#undef preempt_enable_no_resched
> +#undef preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace
> +#undef preempt_check_resched
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
>  
>  struct preempt_notifier;
> 
> 

run into a couple of compile issues.

1)
include/linux/rcupdate.h: In function ‘rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace’:
include/linux/rcupdate.h:889:2: error: implicit declaration of function
‘preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2)
In file included from drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:41:0:
include/linux/uaccess.h: In function ‘pagefault_enable’:
include/linux/uaccess.h:34:2: error: implicit declaration of function
‘preempt_check_resched’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

1) happens when CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set, perhaps add a dummy function?
2) I am not sure if we should take pagefault_enable away from modules

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-20 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-20 16:04 [PATCH 0/7] Cure some vaux idle wrackage Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86, acpi, idle: Restructure the mwait idle routines Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched, preempt: Fixup missed PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED folding Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-21  8:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] idle, thermal, acpi: Remove home grown idle implementations Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:40   ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-11-20 16:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 17:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-20 17:23       ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-11-20 17:55         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-20 18:21           ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-11-20 19:38             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-20 22:08               ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-21  0:54   ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-21  8:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-21 16:07       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-21 16:21         ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-11-21 19:19           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-21 19:45             ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-11-21 20:07               ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-22  0:10                 ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-22  4:20                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-22 11:33                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-22 17:17                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-21 16:29         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-21 17:27           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 4/7] preempt, locking: Rework local_bh_{dis,en}able() Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 5/7] locking: Optimize lock_bh functions Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched: Clean up preempt_enable_no_resched() abuse Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 18:02   ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-20 18:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 20:14       ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-21 10:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-21 13:26       ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-21 13:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-22  6:56           ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-22 11:30             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-26  7:15               ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-26 10:51                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 7/7] preempt: Take away preempt_enable_no_resched() from modules Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 18:54   ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2013-11-20 19:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 19:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 19:29       ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-20 16:34 ` [PATCH 0/7] Cure some vaux idle wrackage Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 17:19   ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-20 17:24     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131120105457.04f6e51e@ultegra \
    --to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bitbucket@online.de \
    --cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox