From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
rui.zhang@intel.com, Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
hpa@zytor.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Cure faux idle wreckage
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:23:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131126152332.1b0dbbdb@ultegra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131126155743.116756708@infradead.org>
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:57:43 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> Respin of the earlier series that tries to cure the 2 idle injection
> drivers and cleans up some of the preempt_enable_no_resched() mess.
>
> The intel_powerclamp driver is tested by Jacob Pan and needs one more
> patch to cpuidle to work as before. I'll let him provide this patch;
> since he actually has it and tested it.
>
> Jacob also said he'll try and work with the QoS people to sort out
> the conflict of interest between the idle injectors and the QoS
> framework.
[Jacob Pan] I have sent out a patch to hook up powerclamp with qos.
Please review. Ideally, this should be in one patchset to avoid
performance regression in powerclamp. If the qos hook is acceptable, it
can be easily used by ACPI PAD, I think.
Jacob
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-26 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-26 15:57 [PATCH 0/8] Cure faux idle wreckage Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-26 15:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86, acpi, idle: Restructure the mwait idle routines Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-26 15:57 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched, preempt: Fixup missed PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED folding Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-26 15:57 ` [PATCH 3/8] idle, thermal, acpi: Remove home grown idle implementations Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-26 15:57 ` [PATCH 4/8] preempt, locking: Rework local_bh_{dis,en}able() Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-26 15:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] locking: Optimize lock_bh functions Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-26 15:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched, net: Clean up preempt_enable_no_resched() abuse Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-26 15:57 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched, net: Fixup busy_loop_us_clock() Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-28 16:49 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-28 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-28 18:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-29 13:52 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-26 15:57 ` [PATCH 8/8] preempt: Take away preempt_enable_no_resched() from modules Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-26 23:23 ` Jacob Pan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131126152332.1b0dbbdb@ultegra \
--to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bitbucket@online.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).