linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Yu Tang <ytang5@marvell.com>,
	Zhou Zhu <zzhu3@marvell.com>,
	"ksankaran@apm.com" <ksankaran@apm.com>, Loc Ho <lho@apm.com>,
	Feng Kan <fkan@apm.com>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 08/12] arm64: kernel: implement HW breakpoints CPU PM notifier
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:29:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131220172907.GF16829@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385033059-25896-9-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

Hi Lorenzo,

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:24:15AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> When a CPU is shutdown either through CPU idle or suspend to RAM, the
> content of HW breakpoint registers must be reset or restored to proper
> values when CPU resume from low power states. This patch adds debug register
> restore operations to the HW breakpoint control function and implements a
> CPU PM notifier that allows to restore the content of HW breakpoint registers
> to allow proper suspend/resume operations.

This looks mostly fine to me, but I have one questions you might be able to
answer...

> @@ -840,18 +847,36 @@ void hw_breakpoint_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
>  /*
>   * CPU initialisation.
>   */
> -static void reset_ctrl_regs(void *unused)
> +static void hw_breakpoint_reset(void *unused)
>  {
>  	int i;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < core_num_brps; ++i) {
> -		write_wb_reg(AARCH64_DBG_REG_BCR, i, 0UL);
> -		write_wb_reg(AARCH64_DBG_REG_BVR, i, 0UL);
> +	struct perf_event **slots;
> +	/*
> +	 * When a CPU goes through cold-boot, it does not have any installed
> +	 * slot, so it is safe to share the same function for restoring and
> +	 * resetting breakpoints; when a CPU is hotplugged in, it goes
> +	 * through the slots, which are all empty, hence it just resets control
> +	 * and value for debug registers.
> +	 * When this function is triggered on warm-boot through a CPU PM
> +	 * notifier some slots might be initialized; if so they are
> +	 * reprogrammed according to the debug slots content.
> +	 */
> +	for (slots = this_cpu_ptr(bp_on_reg), i = 0; i < core_num_brps; ++i) {
> +		if (slots[i]) {
> +			hw_breakpoint_control(slots[i], HW_BREAKPOINT_RESTORE);
> +		} else {
> +			write_wb_reg(AARCH64_DBG_REG_BCR, i, 0UL);
> +			write_wb_reg(AARCH64_DBG_REG_BVR, i, 0UL);
> +		}

When this runs on warm-boot and starts restoring debug state, are debug
exceptions guaranteed to be masked? I think that the debug restoration
should appear atomic to a debugger (i.e. you can't take a debug exception
half-way through the restore).

Providing that's the case:

  Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-20 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-21 11:24 [PATCH RFC v3 00/12] arm64: suspend/resume implementation Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/12] arm64: kernel: add MPIDR_EL1 accessors macros Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/12] arm64: kernel: build MPIDR_EL1 hash function data structure Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/12] arm64: kernel: suspend/resume registers save/restore Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/12] arm64: kernel: cpu_{suspend/resume} implementation Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-12-20 11:30   ` Leo Yan
2013-12-20 11:57     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-23 14:04     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-12-24  6:18       ` Leo Yan
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/12] arm64: kernel: implement fpsimd CPU PM notifier Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/12] arm: kvm: implement " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-11-27  3:02   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/12] arm64: kernel: refactor code to install/uninstall breakpoints Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/12] arm64: kernel: implement HW breakpoints CPU PM notifier Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-12-20 17:29   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2013-12-23 13:50     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/12] arm64: enable generic clockevent broadcast Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/12] arm64: kernel: add CPU idle call Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/12] arm64: kernel: add PM build infrastructure Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-11-21 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/12] arm64: add CPU power management menu/entries Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131220172907.GF16829@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=fkan@apm.com \
    --cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=ksankaran@apm.com \
    --cc=lho@apm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=nico@linaro.org \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ytang5@marvell.com \
    --cc=zzhu3@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).