From: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@unipv.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] PM / Runtime: Fetch runtime PM callbacks using a macro
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:28:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140220162821.GD31820@joshc.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392910280-12891-2-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:31:13PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> While fetching the proper runtime PM callback, we walk the hierarchy of
> device's power domains, subsystems and drivers.
>
> This is common for rpm_suspend(), rpm_idle() and rpm_resume(). Let's
> clean up the code by using a macro that handles this.
>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@unipv.it>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 59 ++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> index 72e00e6..dedbd64 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,23 @@
> #include <trace/events/rpm.h>
> #include "power.h"
>
> +#define RPM_GET_CALLBACK(dev, cb) \
> +({ \
> + if (dev->pm_domain) \
> + callback = dev->pm_domain->ops.cb; \
> + else if (dev->type && dev->type->pm) \
> + callback = dev->type->pm->cb; \
> + else if (dev->class && dev->class->pm) \
> + callback = dev->class->pm->cb; \
> + else if (dev->bus && dev->bus->pm) \
> + callback = dev->bus->pm->cb; \
> + else \
> + callback = NULL; \
> + \
> + if (!callback && dev->driver && dev->driver->pm) \
> + callback = dev->driver->pm->cb; \
Just a matter of style, but toying with the caller's 'callback' variable
is a bit ugly, I'm wondering if it would be cleaner to rework the
statement expression to "return" the callback, which would be used like:
callback = rpm_get_callback(dev, runtime_idle);
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-20 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-20 15:31 [PATCH 0/8] PM / Sleep / Runtime: Fixup some driver's system suspend Ulf Hansson
2014-02-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/8] PM / Runtime: Fetch runtime PM callbacks using a macro Ulf Hansson
2014-02-20 16:28 ` Josh Cartwright [this message]
2014-02-26 15:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-02-26 22:02 ` Ulf Hansson
2014-02-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/8] PM / Sleep / Runtime: Add pm_runtime_suspend|resume_force functions Ulf Hansson
2014-02-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 3/8] spi: pl022: Let runtime PM callbacks be available for CONFIG_PM Ulf Hansson
2014-02-20 17:25 ` Josh Cartwright
2014-02-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 4/8] spi: pl022: Don't ignore power domain and amba bus at system suspend Ulf Hansson
2014-02-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 5/8] i2c: nomadik: Fixup " Ulf Hansson
2014-02-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 6/8] mmc: mmci: Mask IRQs for all variants during runtime suspend Ulf Hansson
2014-02-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 7/8] mmc: mmci: Let runtime PM callbacks be available for CONFIG_PM Ulf Hansson
2014-02-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 8/8] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend Ulf Hansson
2014-02-26 16:30 ` [PATCH 0/8] PM / Sleep / Runtime: Fixup some driver's " Kevin Hilman
2014-02-26 22:30 ` Ulf Hansson
2014-02-27 1:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-27 8:18 ` Ulf Hansson
2014-02-28 17:21 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140220162821.GD31820@joshc.qualcomm.com \
--to=joshc@codeaurora.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rubini@unipv.it \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).