From: Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella@linaro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Austin <Jonathan.Austin@arm.com>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@ti.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/3] ARM hibernation / suspend-to-disk
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:39:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140221183956.29890.80931@capellas-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140220162754.GC15994@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-02-20 08:27:55)
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:33:15PM +0000, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> > Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-02-19 08:12:54)
> > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:52:09AM +0000, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> > > > +static void notrace __swsusp_arch_restore_image(void *unused)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct pbe *pbe;
> > > > +
> > > > + cpu_switch_mm(idmap_pgd, &init_mm);
> >
> > At restore time, we take the save buffer data and restore it to the same
> > physical locations used in the previous execution. This will require having
> > write access to all of memory, which may not be generally granted by the
> > current mm. So we switch to 1-1 init_mm to restore memory.
I can try removing it and seeing if there are side effects.
>
> I still do not understand why switching to idmap, which is a clone of
> init_mm + 1:1 kernel mappings is required here. Why idmap ?
> And while at it, can't the idmap be overwritten _while_ copying back the
> resume kernel ? Is it safe to use idmap page tables while copying ?
Thanks for finding this! I'm concerned about this now. I still
haven't seen where this is handled. I think we do need to switch
to a page table in safe memory, or at least make sure we're not going to
overwrite the page tables we're using. I'll focus on this today
> I had a look at x86 and there idmap page tables used to resume are created
> on the fly using safe pages, on ARM idmap is created at boot.
After looking more at the arm code here's what I see:
- swsusp_read, will restore all hibernation pages to the same physical
pages occupied pre-hibernation if the physical page is free. (get_buffer)
- Since the page is free, nothing is dependent on it, it's writable
and available, so we directly save to it, and it's ready for our
restore.
- if the original page is not free, we save the page to a different
physical page that was not part of the physical page set
pre-hibernation(safe_pages). These pages are added to the
restore_pblist along with the original intended physical address
of the page.
- highmem is handled separately (pages that were not free are swapped
and the memory map updated) (restore_himem) Not sure if this affects
anything, but I thought I'd mention it JIC.
- once we've read all of the hibernation image off of flash, we have a
bunch of pages that are in the wrong place, linked at restore_pblist.
We enter the restore image finisher, where everything is frozen,
irq/fiq disabled and we're ready to suspend, and now we have to copy
the pages in the wrong places back to their original physical pages.
In this state I believe:
- our stack is safe because it's in nosave.
- userspace is frozen, those pages are 'don't care', as we're
discarding its state.
- our instructions and globals are ok, because they're in the
same place as last boot and are not getting restored. None are in
modules.
- Globals: restore_pblist, idmap_pgd, init_mm, swapper_pg_dir
- restore_pblist chain is allocated from "safe pages"
- idmap_pgd table is allocated from freepages without worring about
safe pages -- this is where there may be concern. Also, not sure
about 2nd or 3rd level pages if needed. I'll look into this more.
static void notrace __swsusp_arch_restore_image(void *unused)
{
struct pbe *pbe;
cpu_switch_mm(idmap_pgd, &init_mm);
for (pbe = restore_pblist; pbe; pbe = pbe->next)
copy_page(pbe->orig_address, pbe->address);
soft_restart_noirq(virt_to_phys(cpu_resume));
}
As far as I see, where we are in swsusp_arch_init, the remaining risk
area is this page table. Everything else looks ok? Do you see any
more gaps?
Thanks Lorenzo!!
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-21 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-19 1:52 [PATCH RFC v1 0/3] hibernation support on ARM Sebastian Capella
2014-02-19 1:52 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/3] ARM: Add irq disabled version of soft_restart Sebastian Capella
2014-02-22 10:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-24 23:13 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-02-25 0:22 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-02-25 7:56 ` Russ Dill
2014-02-25 10:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-25 17:15 ` Russ Dill
2014-02-25 23:24 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-02-19 1:52 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/3] Fix hibernation restore hang in freeze_processes Sebastian Capella
2014-02-24 7:09 ` Ming Lei
2014-02-19 1:52 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/3] ARM hibernation / suspend-to-disk Sebastian Capella
2014-02-19 16:12 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-19 19:10 ` Russ Dill
2014-02-20 10:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-19 19:33 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-02-20 16:27 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-21 18:39 ` Sebastian Capella [this message]
2014-02-21 23:59 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-02-22 4:37 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-02-22 6:46 ` Russ Dill
2014-02-22 10:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-22 10:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-22 12:13 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-22 22:30 ` Pavel Machek
2014-02-21 1:01 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-02-22 10:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-22 12:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-22 22:28 ` Pavel Machek
2014-02-23 19:52 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-02-23 20:02 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-02-25 11:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-25 17:55 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-02-26 10:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-26 17:50 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-02-26 19:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140221183956.29890.80931@capellas-linux \
--to=sebastian.capella@linaro.org \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Austin@arm.com \
--cc=Russ.Dill@ti.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=cyril@ti.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=nico@linaro.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).