* [patch 15/16] cpufreq: intel-pstate: Use del_timer_sync in intel_pstate_cpu_exit()
[not found] <20140323150557.288925975@linutronix.de>
@ 2014-03-23 15:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-24 1:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-24 4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2014-03-23 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML; +Cc: Julia Lawall, Andrew Morton, Rafael J. Wysocki, cpufreq, pm
[-- Attachment #1: cpufreq-intel-pstate-use-del_timer_sync.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1152 bytes --]
We are about to free the data structure. Make sure no timer callback
is running. I might be paranoid, but the ->exit callback can be
invoked from so many places, that it is not entirely clear whether
del_timer is always called on the cpu on which it is enqueued.
While looking through the call sites I noticed, that
cpufreq_init_policy() can fail and invoke cpufreq_driver->exit() but
it does not return the failure and the callsite happily proceeds.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: cpufreq <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: tip/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ tip/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_cpu_exit(struct
{
int cpu = policy->cpu;
- del_timer(&all_cpu_data[cpu]->timer);
+ del_timer_sync(&all_cpu_data[cpu]->timer);
kfree(all_cpu_data[cpu]);
all_cpu_data[cpu] = NULL;
return 0;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 15/16] cpufreq: intel-pstate: Use del_timer_sync in intel_pstate_cpu_exit()
2014-03-23 15:09 ` [patch 15/16] cpufreq: intel-pstate: Use del_timer_sync in intel_pstate_cpu_exit() Thomas Gleixner
@ 2014-03-24 1:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-24 14:18 ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-03-24 4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2014-03-24 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, dirk.brandewie, dirk.j.brandewie
Cc: LKML, Julia Lawall, Andrew Morton, cpufreq, pm
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 03:09:32 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> We are about to free the data structure. Make sure no timer callback
> is running. I might be paranoid, but the ->exit callback can be
> invoked from so many places, that it is not entirely clear whether
> del_timer is always called on the cpu on which it is enqueued.
>
> While looking through the call sites I noticed, that
> cpufreq_init_policy() can fail and invoke cpufreq_driver->exit() but
> it does not return the failure and the callsite happily proceeds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: cpufreq <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Dirk?
> ---
>
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: tip/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ tip/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_cpu_exit(struct
> {
> int cpu = policy->cpu;
>
> - del_timer(&all_cpu_data[cpu]->timer);
> + del_timer_sync(&all_cpu_data[cpu]->timer);
> kfree(all_cpu_data[cpu]);
> all_cpu_data[cpu] = NULL;
> return 0;
>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 15/16] cpufreq: intel-pstate: Use del_timer_sync in intel_pstate_cpu_exit()
2014-03-23 15:09 ` [patch 15/16] cpufreq: intel-pstate: Use del_timer_sync in intel_pstate_cpu_exit() Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-24 1:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2014-03-24 4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2014-03-24 4:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: LKML, Julia Lawall, Andrew Morton, Rafael J. Wysocki, cpufreq, pm
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> We are about to free the data structure. Make sure no timer callback
> is running. I might be paranoid, but the ->exit callback can be
> invoked from so many places, that it is not entirely clear whether
> del_timer is always called on the cpu on which it is enqueued.
In normal cases it will be called only when CPU goes offline and I
hope that isn't called on the dying CPU.
> While looking through the call sites I noticed, that
> cpufreq_init_policy() can fail and invoke cpufreq_driver->exit() but
> it does not return the failure and the callsite happily proceeds.
Thanks for reporting this, will get it fixed.
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: cpufreq <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: tip/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ tip/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_cpu_exit(struct
> {
> int cpu = policy->cpu;
>
> - del_timer(&all_cpu_data[cpu]->timer);
> + del_timer_sync(&all_cpu_data[cpu]->timer);
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 15/16] cpufreq: intel-pstate: Use del_timer_sync in intel_pstate_cpu_exit()
2014-03-24 1:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2014-03-24 14:18 ` Dirk Brandewie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dirk Brandewie @ 2014-03-24 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Thomas Gleixner, dirk.j.brandewie
Cc: dirk.brandewie, LKML, Julia Lawall, Andrew Morton, cpufreq, pm
Hi Thomas,
On 03/23/2014 06:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, March 23, 2014 03:09:32 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> We are about to free the data structure. Make sure no timer callback
>> is running. I might be paranoid, but the ->exit callback can be
>> invoked from so many places, that it is not entirely clear whether
>> del_timer is always called on the cpu on which it is enqueued.
>>
>> While looking through the call sites I noticed, that
>> cpufreq_init_policy() can fail and invoke cpufreq_driver->exit() but
>> it does not return the failure and the callsite happily proceeds.
>>
The call to del_timer() has been moved to a new callback in material
in Rafaels pull request for v3.15.
I will send a patch adding this change to the v3.15 material.
--Dirk
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>> Cc: cpufreq <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>
>> Cc: pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
>
> Dirk?
>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Index: tip/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- tip.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> +++ tip/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> @@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_cpu_exit(struct
>> {
>> int cpu = policy->cpu;
>>
>> - del_timer(&all_cpu_data[cpu]->timer);
>> + del_timer_sync(&all_cpu_data[cpu]->timer);
>> kfree(all_cpu_data[cpu]);
>> all_cpu_data[cpu] = NULL;
>> return 0;
>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-24 14:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20140323150557.288925975@linutronix.de>
2014-03-23 15:09 ` [patch 15/16] cpufreq: intel-pstate: Use del_timer_sync in intel_pstate_cpu_exit() Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-24 1:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-24 14:18 ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-03-24 4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).