From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:15:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20140422071541.GA17657@lee--X1> References: <534DB213.7080802@semaphore.gr> <5355A349.50908@semaphore.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:50861 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754142AbaDVHPs (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 03:15:48 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id y10so3437385wgg.1 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5355A349.50908@semaphore.gr> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Stratos Karafotis Cc: Linus Walleij , Samuel Ortiz , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" > The cpufreq core now supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper > for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it. >=20 > It should have no functional changes. > Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis > --- It would be good to have a changelog which describes the differences between the versions, so we can keep track. > drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 19 ++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) So it looks like I already applied v2 of this patch to my tree. What changed in v3 and v4? Should I remove that patch from MFD and apply this one instead? --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog