From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched / idle: Make cpuidle_idle_call() void Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 07:36:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20140423053618.GW26782@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <4717784.WmVEpDoliM@vostro.rjw.lan> <20140422114930.GH11182@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <107574725.ErYUTC83FZ@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:57812 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751971AbaDWFgV (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:36:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <107574725.ErYUTC83FZ@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Daniel Lezcano , Ingo Molnar On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:36:42AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 01:49:30 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 01:26:58AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > > > The only value ever returned by cpuidle_idle_call() is 0 and its > > > only caller ignores that value anyway, so make it void. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Thanks! > > OK, thanks, so should it go through my tree or through tip? I'll take it through tip where there's more patches that touch this code.