From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/8] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove dependency on thermal Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:59:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20140524125946.GA31533@Nokia-N900> References: <20140522145209.GA5246@developer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:38390 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750845AbaEXM7y (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2014 08:59:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Eduardo Valentin , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lists linaro-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arvind Chauhan , Ips Gandhi , Nishanth Menon , Chander Kashyap , "Brown, Len" , Sudeep Holla On Fri 2014-05-23 10:03:27, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 22 May 2014 20:22, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > > However, on CPUs that needs thermal managment, it makes sense to have > > such dependency, from functional perspective. Mainly because scaling > > frequency and voltage up would be allowed only when thermal management > > is enabled. > > AFAIK, dependencies in KCONFIG are only for fixing compilation time issues. I do not think that's correct.