From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3][update] PM / sleep: Introduce command line argument for sleep state enumeration Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:12:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20140610131206.GA7626@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: <1817539.9KW2IGGbDV@vostro.rjw.lan> <2280756.TV3GPFuASb@vostro.rjw.lan> <1579932.qSkFQPvI6f@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:37329 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752027AbaFJNMI (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:12:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1579932.qSkFQPvI6f@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List Hi! > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > On some systems the platform doesn't support neither > PM_SUSPEND_MEM nor PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY, so PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE is the > only available system sleep state. However, some user space frameworks > only use the "mem" and (sometimes) "standby" sleep state labels, so > the users of those systems need to modify user space in order to be > able to use system suspend at all and that is not always possible. I'd say we should fix the frameworks, not add option to change kernel interfaces. Because, as you mentioned, if we add this, we are probably going to get stuck with it forever :-(. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html