From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 12/17] cpuidle: mvebu: make the cpuidle driver capable of handling multiple SoCs Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:38:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20140721143813.6028b6ed@free-electrons.com> References: <1404913221-17343-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <52019695.n2AjkGEsJ7@wuerfel> <20140721133534.3415e425@free-electrons.com> <5251405.VTrfDi1rj5@wuerfel> <20140721140917.16e71558@free-electrons.com> <53CD08CF.6080900@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]:53012 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754579AbaGUMiR (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:38:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <53CD08CF.6080900@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lior Amsalem , Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , Tawfik Bayouk , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Nadav Haklai , Ezequiel Garcia , Gregory Clement , Sebastian Hesselbarth Dear Daniel Lezcano, On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:34:23 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > So there are three solutions: > > 1. Pass the flag through the platform data, I am not really in favor of > that as mentioned above That's what is already implemented. > > 2. Use the compatible string like the cpuidle-big-little.c driver, but > Arnd is not in favor of that > > 3. Register 3 platform drivers, in cpuidle-mvebu-v7.c, and let the > registering of the cpuidle's platform device to enable the right one I'm fine with doing (3). Daniel, Arnd, let me know if that's ok for you, and I'll respin the patch series accordingly. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com