public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	changcheng.liu@intel.com, xiaoming.wang@intel.com,
	souvik.k.chakravarty@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix the CPU stuck at C0 for 2-3s after PM_QOS back to DEFAULT
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:41:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140814124135.GJ16043@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53EC9A29.8090408@linaro.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2721 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:14:49PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/14/2014 01:00 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:29:32PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>Hi Chuansheng,
> >>
> >>On 14 August 2014 04:11, Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>We found sometimes even after we let PM_QOS back to DEFAULT,
> >>>the CPU still stuck at C0 for 2-3s, don't do the new suitable C-state
> >>>selection immediately after received the IPI interrupt.
> >>>
> >>>The code model is simply like below:
> >>>{
> >>>         pm_qos_update_request(&pm_qos, C1 - 1);
> >>>                 < == Here keep all cores at C0
> >>>         ...;
> >>>         pm_qos_update_request(&pm_qos, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
> >>>                 < == Here some cores still stuck at C0 for 2-3s
> >>>}
> >>>
> >>>The reason is when pm_qos come back to DEFAULT, there is IPI interrupt to
> >>>wake up the core, but when core is in poll idle state, the IPI interrupt
> >>>can not break the polling loop.
> >
> >So seeing how you're from @intel.com I'm assuming you're using x86 here.
> >
> >I'm not seeing how this can be possible, MWAIT is interrupted by IPIs
> >just fine, which means we'll fall out of the cpuidle_enter(), which
> >means we'll cpuidle_reflect(), and then leave cpuidle_idle_call().
> >
> >It will indeed not leave the cpu_idle_loop() function and go right back
> >into cpuidle_idle_call(), but that will then call cpuidle_select() which
> >should pick a new C state.
> >
> >So the interrupt _should_ work. If it doesn't you need to explain why.
> 
> I think the issue is related to the poll_idle state, in
> drivers/cpuidle/driver.c. This state is x86 specific and inserted in the
> cpuidle table as the state 0 (POLL). There is no mwait for this state. It is
> a bit confusing because this state is not listed in the acpi / intel idle
> driver but inserted implicitly at the beginning of the idle table by the
> cpuidle framework when the driver is registered.
> 
> static int poll_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>                 struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
> {
>         local_irq_enable();
>         if (!current_set_polling_and_test()) {
>                 while (!need_resched())
>                         cpu_relax();
>         }
>         current_clr_polling();
> 
>         return index;
> }

Ah, well, in that case there's a ton more broken than just this.
kick_all_cpus_sync() won't work either, and cpuidle_reflect() pretty
much expects to be called after each interrupt.

Then again, not reflecting properly isn't really a problem, its not like
not accounting interrupts is going to safe power much.



[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-14 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-14  2:11 [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix the CPU stuck at C0 for 2-3s after PM_QOS back to DEFAULT Chuansheng Liu
     [not found] ` <CAKnoXLw3DrBAxCUWEkXtvCTf+E1w0xTHJSiSUY6Qd6xHXeGaoQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-08-14 10:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-14 11:24     ` Liu, Chuansheng
2014-08-14 13:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-14 14:10         ` Liu, Chuansheng
2014-08-14 14:17           ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-08-14 14:26             ` Liu, Chuansheng
2014-08-14 11:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-14 11:14     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-08-14 11:17       ` Liu, Chuansheng
2014-08-14 12:41       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-08-14 13:29         ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-08-14 13:57           ` Liu, Chuansheng
2014-08-14 21:12       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-14 21:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-14 21:22           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15  1:21             ` Liu, Chuansheng
2014-08-15  1:27               ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140814124135.GJ16043@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=changcheng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=souvik.k.chakravarty@intel.com \
    --cc=xiaoming.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox