From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lina Iyer Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] arm: dts: qcom: Add SPM device bindings for 8974 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:23:45 -0600 Message-ID: <20140924172345.GE422@ilina-mac> References: <1411516281-58328-1-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> <1411516281-58328-3-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> <5422621E.2050509@smartplayin.com> <20140924134939.GA422@ilina-mac> <5422FD8D.8080307@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5422FD8D.8080307@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Pramod Gurav , galak@codeaurora.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, khilman@linaro.org, msivasub@codeaurora.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 24 2014 at 11:21 -0600, Stephen Boyd wrote: >On 09/24/14 06:49, Lina Iyer wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 24 2014 at 00:14 -0600, Pramod Gurav wrote: >>> Hi Lina, >>> >>> On Wednesday 24 September 2014 05:21 AM, Lina Iyer wrote: >>>> Add SPM device bindings for QCOM 8974 based cpus. SPM is the sub-system >>>> power manager and controls the logic around the cores (cpu and L2). >>>> >>>> Each core has an instance of SPM and controls only that core. Each cpu >>>> SPM is configured to support WFI and SPC (standalone-power collapse). >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-pm.dtsi | 69 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 10 +++-- >>>> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-pm.dtsi >>> >>> >>> >>>> +}; >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi >>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi >>>> index 69dca2a..0580bc2 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi >>>> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ >>>> #size-cells = <0>; >>>> interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>; >>>> >>>> - cpu@0 { >>>> + CPU0: cpu@0 { >>> Lina, Stephen boyd has sent some DT change for krait-cpufreq which also >>> renames this node to "cpu0: cpu@0". If you both could sync up and agree >>> on a common naming('cpu0' with caps or not caps) for this node. >>> >> Sure. Will work with Stephen on that. >> > >This doesn't seem like a big deal. I imagine Kumar can resolve the >conflict if the two patches merge at the same time. > I can use the lower case names, if thats common. I see that being used for referring to <&acc> in that file, but ofcourse <&L2> exists as well. Any preference? >-- >Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, >hosted by The Linux Foundation >