From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:46:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20141007164643.GA3748@kroah.com> References: <20141007114844.GT4609@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33293 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752036AbaJGQqo (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:46:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141007114844.GT4609@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Xiaoguang Chen , Stratos Karafotis , Andreas Schwab , Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Amit Kucheria , stable@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:48:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Hi, > > The power management team at Linaro has had a look at the cpufreq > updates since the v3.10 LTS and identified a few patches that look > like they should be in there. The most recent of these is from v3.12 so > they won't apply to any of the more recent stable kernels. > > - 59a6342203a7a cpufreq: Fix governor start/stop race condition > > This looks like a straight race condition fix. That is not a commit id in Linus's tree :(