From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:56:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20141007225624.GA8171@kroah.com> References: <20141007114844.GT4609@sirena.org.uk> <20141007164643.GA3748@kroah.com> <20141007170800.GL4609@sirena.org.uk> <20141007200458.GA12028@kroah.com> <20141007204505.GL4609@sirena.org.uk> <20141007215807.GA29188@kroah.com> <20141007225006.GM4609@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39368 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752353AbaJGW4Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:56:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141007225006.GM4609@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Xiaoguang Chen , Stratos Karafotis , Andreas Schwab , Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Amit Kucheria , stable@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:50:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:58:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:45:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Actually I thinkoed here, as I said in reply to the stable mail the > > > problematic patch was "19c763031acb8 cpufreq: serialize calls to > > > __cpufreq_governor()" which was reverted in "56d07db cpufreq: Remove > > > temporary fix for race between CPU hotplug and sysfs-writes". The above > > > commit ID (95731eb) should be good. > > > > Sorry about the confusion here. > > > Ok, I'm still confused. I've applied 3 patches to the 3.10-stable > > queue, in this order: > > To the best of my ability to assess: > > > 19c763031acb831a5ab9c1a701b7fedda073eb3f cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor() > > This one is bad. Ok, now deleted, thanks for letting me know. greg k-h