From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] power: reset: document LTC2952 poweroff support Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 09:09:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20141009160935.GF31987@roeck-us.net> References: <1412866242-6474-1-git-send-email-frans.klaver@xsens.com> <1412866242-6474-3-git-send-email-frans.klaver@xsens.com> <20141009150756.GC18384@leverpostej> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:60788 "EHLO mail-pa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751197AbaJIQJm (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 12:09:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141009150756.GC18384@leverpostej> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Rutland Cc: Frans Klaver , Sebastian Reichel , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Moll , Tjerk Hofmeijer , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , David Woodhouse , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Rob Herring , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 04:07:56PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:50:42PM +0100, Frans Klaver wrote: > > From: Ren=E9 Moll > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Ren=E9 Moll > > Signed-off-by: Tjerk Hofmeijer > > Signed-off-by: Frans Klaver > > --- > > .../bindings/power/reset/ltc2952-poweroff.txt | 31 ++++++++++= ++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/l= tc2952-poweroff.txt > >=20 > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/ltc2952-= poweroff.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/ltc2952-po= weroff.txt > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..c3f3d9e > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/ltc2952-powerof= f.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ > > +Binding for the LTC2952 PowerPath controller > > + > > +This chip is used to externally trigger a system shut down. Once t= he trigger > > +has been sent, the chips watchdog has to be reset to gracefully sh= ut down. >=20 > s/chips/chip's/ >=20 > > If +the Linux systems decides to shut down, it powers off the platf= orm > > via the +poweroff signal. >=20 > This sentence can go; the binding should describe the hardware rather > than the Linux behaviour. >=20 Maybe find an operating system independent wording and describe what th= e implementation should do. Or is that out of scope as well ? Thanks, Guenter