From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kasagar, Srinidhi" Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add sfi based cpufreq driver support Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 22:44:01 +0530 Message-ID: <20141010171401.GA27359@intel-desktop> References: <20141007140734.GB24200@intel-desktop> <20141008191454.GA6504@intel-desktop> <20141009180826.GA32265@intel-desktop> <20141009190747.GA31674@intel-desktop> <20141010165126.GA14463@intel-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:2931 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752586AbaJJJOm (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 05:14:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Brandewie, Dirk J" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "Rudramuni, Vishwesh M" On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:27:17PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 10 October 2014 22:21, Kasagar, Srinidhi wrote: > > I have not debugged that. However, to double check the same I have rebased to the > > clean upstream tree and I don't see ->target_index() is called for any > > other CPUs during the offline-online path.. > > OKay, this is getting a bit confusing. > > ->target_index() is called for which CPU? It was called for the sibling cpu of the onlined one. Srinidhi