linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <heiner.kallweit@web.de>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] imx: thermal: imx_get_temp might be called before sensor clock is prepared
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:47:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141107234707.GB27665@developer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <545D4B03.6080400@web.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5408 bytes --]

Heiner,

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:43:15PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Am 07.11.2014 um 19:18 schrieb Eduardo Valentin:
> > 
> > Hello Heiner,
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:51:23PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >> imx_get_temp might be called before the sensor clock is prepared
> >> thus resulting in a timeout of the first attempt to read temp:
> >> thermal thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone 0
> >> Happened to me on a Utilite Standard with IMX6 Dual SoC.
> >>
> >> Reason is that in imx_thermal_probe thermal_zone_device_register
> >> is called before the sensor clock is prepared.
> >> thermal_zone_device_register however calls
> >> thermal_zone_device_update which eventually calls imx_get_temp.
> >>
> >> Fix this by preparing the clock before calling
> >> thermal_zone_device_register.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <heiner.kallweit@web.de>
> >> ---
> >> v2: revised error path. Bail out and tidy up properly if we can't
> >>     get the clock or fail to enable it
> >> v3: don't print error message if getting clock returns EPROBE_DEFER
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
> >> index 461bf3d..0e8ef55 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
> >> @@ -521,6 +521,30 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>                 return ret;
> >>         }
> >>
> >> +       data->thermal_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> >> +       if (IS_ERR(data->thermal_clk)) {
> >> +               ret = PTR_ERR(data->thermal_clk);
> >> +               if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> >> +                       dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> >> +                               "failed to get thermal clk: %d\n", ret);
> >> +               cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cdev);
> >> +               return ret;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >> +       /*
> >> +        * Thermal sensor needs clk on to get correct value, normally
> >> +        * we should enable its clk before taking measurement and disable
> >> +        * clk after measurement is done, but if alarm function is enabled,
> >> +        * hardware will auto measure the temperature periodically, so we
> >> +        * need to keep the clk always on for alarm function.
> >> +        */
> >> +       ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->thermal_clk);
> >> +       if (ret) {
> >> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable thermal clk: %d\n", ret);
> >> +               cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cdev);
> >> +               return ret;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >>         data->tz = thermal_zone_device_register("imx_thermal_zone",
> >>                                                 IMX_TRIP_NUM,
> >>                                                 BIT(IMX_TRIP_PASSIVE), data,
> >> @@ -531,26 +555,11 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>                 ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> >>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> >>                         "failed to register thermal zone device %d\n", ret);
> >> +               clk_disable_unprepare(data->thermal_clk);
> >>                 cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cdev);
> >>                 return ret;
> >>         }
> >>
> >> -       data->thermal_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> >> -       if (IS_ERR(data->thermal_clk)) {
> >> -               dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to get thermal clk!\n");
> >> -       } else {
> >> -               /*
> >> -                * Thermal sensor needs clk on to get correct value, normally
> >> -                * we should enable its clk before taking measurement and disable
> >> -                * clk after measurement is done, but if alarm function is enabled,
> >> -                * hardware will auto measure the temperature periodically, so we
> >> -                * need to keep the clk always on for alarm function.
> >> -                */
> >> -               ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->thermal_clk);
> >> -               if (ret)
> >> -                       dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable thermal clk: %d\n", ret);
> >> -       }
> >> -
> >>         /* Enable measurements at ~ 10 Hz */
> >>         regmap_write(map, TEMPSENSE1 + REG_CLR, TEMPSENSE1_MEASURE_FREQ);
> >>         measure_freq = DIV_ROUND_UP(32768, 10); /* 10 Hz */
> > 
> > 
> > While here, do you need to move up also the configuration of the
> > measurements at ~ 10 Hz? Or would still the first readings be correct
> > while at the reset value?
> When imx_get_temp is called from thermal_zone_device_register data->mode still is
> THERMAL_DEVICE_DISABLED. imx_get_temp therefore will power on the sensor and
> trigger a single measurement.
> IMHO this is fully ok and I don't think we have to relocate the setup of the
> scheduled measurements.


OK. I see. 

In this case, can you please re-post this patch on top of my -fixes
patches? I am planing to send it in the -rc cycles.

I've just merged another fix on imx driver and looks like your
patch needs refreshing now. 


Thanks,

Eduardo Valentin

> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Eduardo Valentin
> >> --
> >> 2.1.2
> Rgds, Heiner
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2014-11-07 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-13 20:51 [PATCH v3] imx: thermal: imx_get_temp might be called before sensor clock is prepared Heiner Kallweit
2014-11-07 18:18 ` Eduardo Valentin
2014-11-07 22:43   ` Heiner Kallweit
2014-11-07 23:47     ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141107234707.GB27665@developer \
    --to=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiner.kallweit@web.de \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).