From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kasagar, Srinidhi" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] cpufreq: Add SFI based cpufreq driver support Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:15:36 +0530 Message-ID: <20141119094536.GA24181@intel-desktop> References: <20141118054537.GA28516@intel-desktop> <20141118172130.GA29590@intel-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:32411 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753542AbaKSJpV (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:45:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Brown, Len" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "Rudramuni, Vishwesh M" , Len Brown On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:03:38PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 18 November 2014 22:51, Kasagar, Srinidhi wrote: > > Not anymore now..I have fixed it in my earlier version. > > > > $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/affected_cpus > > 0 > > 1 > > 2 > > 3 > > > > $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/related_cpus > > 0 > > 1 > > 2 > > 3 > > What do you mean by you have fixed it? Weren't the CPUs sharing clock lines? > I hope cpu 0 and 1 should be sharing their clock lines, i.e. they > change freq together. > Also same for cpu 2 and 3. The architecture supports both, and the current code allows me to change the freq independently and that's why the above output lines. Srinidhi