From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 2/5] OOM: thaw the OOM victim if it is frozen Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:59:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20141207135940.GB19034@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20141110163055.GC18373@dhcp22.suse.cz> <1417797707-31699-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> <1417797707-31699-3-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> <20141206130657.GC18711@htj.dyndns.org> <20141207102430.GF15892@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20141207104539.GK15892@dhcp22.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141207104539.GK15892@dhcp22.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , "\\\"Rafael J. Wysocki\\\"" , David Rientjes , Johannes Weiner , Oleg Nesterov , Cong Wang , LKML , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 11:45:39AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: .... > void mark_tsk_oom_victim(struct task_struct *tsk) > { > set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_MEMDIE); > + __thaw_task(tsk); Yeah, this is a lot better. Maybe we can add a comment at least pointing readers to where to look at to understand what's going on? This stems from the fact that OOM killer which essentially is a memory reclaim operation overrides freezing. It'd be nice if that is documented somehow. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org