From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/28] cpufreq: drop owner assignment from platform_drivers Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:23:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20141231102326.GA1461@katana> References: <1419196495-9626-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <1419196495-9626-6-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <2262992.pVJSfL5P4D@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:43306 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751171AbaLaKXb (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Dec 2014 05:23:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2262992.pVJSfL5P4D@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Viresh Kumar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:39:32PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, December 22, 2014 07:14:56 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 22 December 2014 at 02:44, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > This platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by the > > > driver core. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > > --- > > > Generated with coccinelle. SmPL file is in the introductory msg. The big > > > cleanup was pulled in this merge window. This series catches the bits fallen > > > through. The patches shall go in via the subsystem trees. > > > > > > drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c | 1 - > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c > > > index 25fbd6a1374f..f0913eee2f50 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c > > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c > > > @@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ out: > > > static struct platform_driver ls1x_cpufreq_platdrv = { > > > .driver = { > > > .name = "ls1x-cpufreq", > > > - .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > > }, > > > .probe = ls1x_cpufreq_probe, > > > .remove = ls1x_cpufreq_remove, > > > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > > -- > > OK > > Wolfram, please feel free to push this through whatever tree you think is > appropriate. I'd prefer if you take it. However, I'll send all leftover ones to Greg, so you can decide.