From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kbuild test robot Subject: [PATCH vireshk] cpufreq: __cpufreq_boost_supported() can be static Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:55:19 +0800 Message-ID: <20150116065519.GA30921@lkp-sb04> References: <201501161410.qF6rUO8n%fengguang.wu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:51300 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751439AbbAPGzc (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 01:55:32 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201501161410.qF6rUO8n%fengguang.wu@intel.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:512:5: sparse: symbol '__cpufreq_boost_supported' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu --- cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index c151f4b..4e3d42f 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ unlock: return ret; } -int __cpufreq_boost_supported(void) +static int __cpufreq_boost_supported(void) { if (likely(cpufreq_driver)) return cpufreq_driver->boost_supported;