From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javi Merino Subject: Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:10:50 +0000 Message-ID: <20150116121049.GB2898@e104805> References: <54B7F7CD.7030903@free.fr> <1421399293.11224.7.camel@AMDC1943> <54B8F19F.8060108@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com ([217.140.108.86]:35848 "EHLO foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751595AbbAPMK7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 07:10:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54B8F19F.8060108@free.fr> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Mason Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Linux ARM , Linux PM , cpufreq , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar Hi Mason, On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:10:23AM +0000, Mason wrote: [...] > OK. I'm also interested in frequency-throttling when temperatures > rise beyond specific thresholds. What subsystem ties sensors and > cpufreq together? The thermal framework. Have a look at Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt and Documentation/thermal/cpu-cooling-api.txt Cheers, Javi