From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / sleep: add configurable delay for pm_test Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 21:32:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20150221203256.GA15228@amd> References: <1409788535-28264-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <20141213025530.GO21347@ld-irv-0074> <20141213083123.GA26129@amd> <20141216235813.GI9759@ld-irv-0074> <20141217080947.GB2027@amd> <20141217091057.GH7112@brian-ubuntu> <20141217092255.GA4588@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:58775 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751448AbbBUUc7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2015 15:32:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Brian Norris , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Len Brown , Chirantan Ekbote > Considering that Brian's change are enclosed within a CONFIG_PM_DEBUG > ifdef, can we really use the code bloat as a technical argument here? Yes. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html