From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq / PM: Add flag for shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:11:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20150227221100.GV5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1424771762-16343-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <6864616.1aRDSmSsvx@vostro.rjw.lan> <20150227083859.GD21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1968084.K4YyaeZfBq@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:38695 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755403AbbB0WLP (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:11:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1968084.K4YyaeZfBq@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Boris Brezillon , Mark Rutland , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Ferre , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Alexandre Belloni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linux PM list On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:13:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, February 27, 2015 09:38:59 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Seems good to me. Should I take this through tip/irq ? > > I can apply it along with the previous IRQF_NO_SUSPEND documentation patch > from Mark Rutland if you ACK it for me. :-) Works for me, Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > > Also, should we warn if people use enable_irq_wake() where there is only > > a single descriptor with NO_SUSPEND? > > We probably should do that, but that would be a separate patch IMO? Agreed. Just wanted to raise the point.