From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Yan Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq-dt: support cluster level clock Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:35:47 +0800 Message-ID: <20150304023547.GB21106@leoy-linaro> References: <1425387817-11382-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org> <1425387817-11382-2-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org> <20150303140331.GA11325@leoy-linaro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Shawn Guo , Thomas Petazzoni , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:49:25PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 3 March 2015 at 19:33, Leo Yan wrote: > > I'm just thinking to finish things in one time. From my previous > > experience, clocks per cluster are common cases for ARM's > > multi-clusters, so i think it's reasonable to add related support. > > Yes they are common, but that will be fixed with new OPP bindings > I am working on [1]. Good to know this and looking forward the patches... > > Regarding of testing this patch, i created two virtual clocks for > > every cluster and passed the test. Do u think this is acceptable? > > Just to confirm again, we aren't going to accept or apply these > patches. It will work without any changes for you, for now. OK, i will go back to just support for the case of one clock source. > -- > viresh > > [1] https://www.marc.info/?l=linaro-kernel&m=142364262800650&w=3