linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] pm: domains: avoid potential oops in pm_genpd_remove_device()
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:23:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150313132315.GK8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFq8P7eceHkPFDnyUwpfjEN_0ao0NDLoxNjE7h4KDBL=qA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 09:56:02AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 12 March 2015 at 19:31, Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > index b3fbc21da2dc..11a1023fa64a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > @@ -1509,7 +1509,7 @@ int pm_genpd_remove_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> >
> >         dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
> >
> > -       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(genpd) || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)
> > +       if (!pm_genpd_present(genpd) || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)
> 
> The are two issues with this approach.
> 
> 1. pm_genpd_present() is build only for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP set.
> 2. pm_genpd_present() totally ignores holding the mutex which protects
> the list of GPDs.

Well, having looked more deeply at this, the PM domain code has more
problems.

void pm_genpd_syscore_poweroff(struct device *dev)
{
        genpd_syscore_switch(dev, true);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_genpd_syscore_poweroff);

void pm_genpd_syscore_poweron(struct device *dev)
{
        genpd_syscore_switch(dev, false);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_genpd_syscore_poweron);

both of these functions are externally callable without holding the
gpd_list_lock mutex, which results in:

static void genpd_syscore_switch(struct device *dev, bool suspend)
{
        struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;

        genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
        if (!pm_genpd_present(genpd))
                return;

calling this function without holding the gpd_list_lock either.

It also seems that there's a variety of ways which the generic PM domain
code gets from a struct device to a generic_pm_domain - one is the above.
Another is having this open coded:

        mutex_lock(&gpd_list_lock);
        list_for_each_entry(gpd, &gpd_list, gpd_list_node) {
                if (&gpd->domain == dev->pm_domain) {
                        pd = gpd;
                        break;
                }
        }
        mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);

This is only _not_ buggy because we only ever add to the list, never
remove from it, so we can be sure that a successfully obtained "pd"
will remain valid after the lock is dropped.

Another is:

        genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
        if (IS_ERR(genpd))
		...

when we're sure that dev->pm_domain points at a generic PM domain (in
the various runtime PM functions.)  It should be also noted that
dev_to_genpd() is exported to the whole kernel - is that safe?

In any case, I think dev_to_genpd() at least needs some commentry before
it saying that it is only for use when we know for certain that the
device has a generic_pm_domain attached, or the PM domain power is NULL
or an error pointer.

This is turning out to be a right can of worms...

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-13 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-12 18:30 [FOR DISCUSSION 0/9] Dove PMU support Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-12 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/9] pm: domains: quieten down generic pm domains Russell King
2015-03-13  8:46   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-13 15:57   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-12 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/9] pm: domains: avoid potential oops in pm_genpd_remove_device() Russell King
2015-03-13  8:56   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-13  9:20     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-13 12:45       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-03-14  1:27         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-13 13:23     ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-03-13 16:33   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-13 16:58     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-12 18:31 ` [PATCH 3/9] pm: domains: sync runtime PM status with PM domains after probe Russell King
2015-03-12 23:25   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-13  9:30   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-13 10:14     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-13 10:42       ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-13 13:39     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-13 16:45   ` Kevin Hilman
     [not found] ` <20150312183020.GU8656-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-13 11:57   ` [FOR DISCUSSION 0/9] Dove PMU support Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-13 12:11     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-13 12:26       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-13 12:32         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-13 12:47           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-13 16:23   ` [PATCH 04/10] pm: domains: sync runtime PM status with PM domains after probe Russell King
     [not found]     ` <E1YWSN5-0006G5-Ld-eh5Bv4kxaXIANfyc6IWni62ZND6+EDdj@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-13 17:33       ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-13 16:22 ` [FOR DISCUSSION 0/10] Dove PMU support Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-13 16:23 ` [PATCH 01/10] pm: domains: quieten down generic pm domains Russell King
2015-03-13 17:10   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-13 16:23 ` [PATCH 02/10] pm: domains: factor out code to get the generic PM domain from a struct device Russell King
2015-03-13 17:20   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-13 17:35     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-13 16:23 ` [PATCH 03/10] pm: domains: avoid potential oops in pm_genpd_remove_device() Russell King
2015-03-13 17:28   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-19 21:59 ` [FOR DISCUSSION 0/9] Dove PMU support Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-19 22:02   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-20 12:16     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-20 12:44       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-20 17:19         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-20 17:20           ` [PATCH 1/3] pm: domains: quieten down generic pm domains Russell King
2015-03-20 17:20           ` [PATCH 2/3] pm: domains: factor out code to get the generic PM domain from a struct device Russell King
2015-03-23 13:28             ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-23 15:17               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-24  0:29                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-26 15:20                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-26 16:00                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-20 17:20           ` [PATCH 3/3] pm: domains: avoid potential oops in pm_genpd_remove_device() Russell King
2015-03-23 13:32             ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150313132315.GK8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).