From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PM, freezer: Don't thaw when it's intended frozen processes Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:54:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20150513135438.GR11388@htj.duckdns.org> References: <20150507064557.GA26928@july> <20150507154212.GA12245@htj.duckdns.org> <20150508152513.GB28439@htj.duckdns.org> <20150512144313.GO11388@htj.duckdns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Kyungmin Park Cc: linux-mm , Andrew Morton , "\\Rafael J. Wysocki\\" , David Rientjes , Johannes Weiner , Oleg Nesterov , Cong Wang , LKML , Linux PM list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:42:47AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Right, it's still in freezer, just one time scheduling is happened. > and enter freeze state again. > > do you think can we avoid it or it's sub-optimal to do as patch? I mean, it's suboptimal. I'm not sure it actually matters tho. If it matters, please feel free to submit a patch with proper rationale. Please just be careful so that we don't miss sending out wakeup in case we race against thawing. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org