From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 09/14] cpufreq: add/remove sysfs links via cpufreq_add_remove_dev_symlink() Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 09:11:20 +0530 Message-ID: <20150523034120.GA4210@linux> References: <93a3bfbe26dfa1c298e21da369e6ed37fca1da34.1431924457.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <3403066.ABqM7b3uGI@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:33177 "EHLO mail-pd0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756243AbbEWDlZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2015 23:41:25 -0400 Received: by pdbqa5 with SMTP id qa5so32966002pdb.0 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 20:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3403066.ABqM7b3uGI@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, prarit@redhat.com, skannan@codeaurora.org, Srivatsa Bhat On 23-05-15, 01:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > (The last statement line is likely longer than 80 chars, but that's fine.) No, it isn't. I am dropping this patch and merging it with the next one. Otherwise it generates warnings about routine defined but not used. So I will be resending 10/14 and that replaces 9-10/14. Thanks. -- viresh