From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org,
shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@redhat.com,
robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de, skannan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: governor: split cpufreq_governor_dbs()
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:47:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150604101706.GB743@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5570229F.3080808@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 04-06-15, 15:34, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> > + if (dbs_data) {
> > + WARN_ON(have_governor_per_policy());
>
> Shouldn't this be outside this loop ? We warn here and allocate dbs_dta
Loop ? Its just an 'if' block :)
> freshly in the current code for the case where governor is per policy.
So what we are doing in the current code is equally disgusting. We
already have a pointer and we overwrite it.
>
> > + dbs_data->usage_count++;
>
> Besides, in the case where a governor exists per policy, we will end up
> incrementing the usage_count to more than 1 under this condition, which
> does not make sense.
So, the only sane option here is to return an error immediately I
think.
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index ed849a8777dd..57a39f8a92b7 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -247,7 +247,8 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
int ret;
if (dbs_data) {
- WARN_ON(have_governor_per_policy());
+ if (WARN_ON(have_governor_per_policy()))
+ return -EINVAL;
dbs_data->usage_count++;
policy->governor_data = dbs_data;
return 0;
@@ -276,24 +277,28 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
latency * LATENCY_MULTIPLIER));
if (!have_governor_per_policy()) {
- WARN_ON(cpufreq_get_global_kobject());
+ if (WARN_ON(cpufreq_get_global_kobject())) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto cdata_exit;
+ }
cdata->gdbs_data = dbs_data;
}
ret = sysfs_create_group(get_governor_parent_kobj(policy),
get_sysfs_attr(dbs_data));
if (ret)
- goto cdata_exit;
+ goto put_kobj;
policy->governor_data = dbs_data;
return 0;
-cdata_exit:
+put_kobj:
if (!have_governor_per_policy()) {
cdata->gdbs_data = NULL;
cpufreq_put_global_kobject();
}
+cdata_exit:
cdata->exit(dbs_data, !policy->governor->initialized);
free_dbs_data:
kfree(dbs_data);
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-04 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 10:27 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: governor: Fix potential races Viresh Kumar
2015-06-03 10:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: governor: register notifier from cs_init() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 5:38 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 6:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 7:33 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-03 10:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: governor: split cpufreq_governor_dbs() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 10:04 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-06-04 11:13 ` [PATCH V2 " Viresh Kumar
2015-06-05 2:51 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-03 10:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: governor: Serialize governor callbacks Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 10:47 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 5:14 ` [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: governor: Fix potential races Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 6:08 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 6:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 6:36 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 6:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 7:04 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 7:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 7:27 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-05 3:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-05 3:04 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-05 4:05 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15 23:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150604101706.GB743@linux \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de \
--cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox