From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq: Fix governor races - part 2 Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:49:46 +0530 Message-ID: <20150618051946.GD28820@linux> References: <2124579.Ezk09YdVq9@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:33703 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299AbbFRFTz (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 01:19:55 -0400 Received: by padev16 with SMTP id ev16so52894367pad.0 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:19:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2124579.Ezk09YdVq9@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Preeti U Murthy , ke.wang@spreadtrum.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@redhat.com, robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de, skannan@codeaurora.org On 16-06-15, 01:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Given the Preeti's comments on these patches I don't think they are quite > ready and the 4.2 merge window is next week. I don't think this series is > 4.2 material, so please target it at the next one. I agreed to this earlier, yes. But will it be possible to push [1-5]/12 for 4.2 ? Its not that they are really important and something like that, but there is no point sending these trivial patches to lists (they are already Reviewed-by Preeti, leaving 3/12 which I have asked her to review today). Wanna avoid unnecessary noise over lists, that's it. I see that these are not anymore in patchwork, so you might want me to send them again. Will do that once you confirm. Thanks. -- viresh