From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] ARM: STi: STiH407: Move PWM nodes STiH407 => STiH407-family Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:25:59 +0530 Message-ID: <20150623075559.GG16776@linux> References: <1434987837-24212-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1434987837-24212-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20150623021708.GB16776@linux> <20150623070822.GB3245@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:36119 "EHLO mail-pd0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752967AbbFWH4D (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 03:56:03 -0400 Received: by pdcu2 with SMTP id u2so1868826pdc.3 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:56:03 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150623070822.GB3245@x1> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ajitpal.singh@st.com On 23-06-15, 08:08, Lee Jones wrote: > Because the CPUFreq regulator is controlled with PWM and CPUFreq will > fail on STiH410 (my main development platform) without it. I see, probably this should find a place in the cover-letter :) > It's safe for you to ignore it though. Thanks :) -- viresh