From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: STi: STiH407: Provide a node for CPUFreq Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:27:37 +0530 Message-ID: <20150623075737.GH16776@linux> References: <1434987837-24212-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1434987837-24212-5-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20150623021622.GA16776@linux> <20150623071045.GC3245@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:33152 "EHLO mail-pd0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932251AbbFWH5m (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 03:57:42 -0400 Received: by pdjn11 with SMTP id n11so1977961pdj.0 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:57:41 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150623071045.GC3245@x1> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: rob.herring@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ajitpal.singh@st.com On 23-06-15, 08:10, Lee Jones wrote: > > These virtual nodes aren't allowed in DT and you have added them > > before the bindings patch :). > > This isn't a virtual node, but you bring up a good point. Hmm, wrong choice of words. Sorry.. So, its a node for a virtual device :). The device is CPU and it already has a node for itself. And so such nodes were discouraged earlier by DT maintainers. -- viresh