From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, "mnipxh@163.com" <mnipxh@163.com>,
"yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: use same acpi_cpufreq_data if policy is shared
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 14:16:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150703084657.GB23297@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5596414C.4090106@intel.com>
On 03-07-15, 16:01, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>
> cpufreq core will mark all cpus in policy->cpus as initialized
> by setting percpu cpufreq_cpu_data = policy.
> However in acpi-cpufreq, we did not set percpu acpi_cpufreq_data for
> all cpus in policy->cpus.
> That will cause a issue that when we call get_cur_freq_on_cpu for a
> cpu, it returns zero instead of a correct value.
>
> So we shared acpi_cpufreq_data for all those cpus in policy->cpus.
>
> Signed-off-by: xinhuix.pan <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 0136dfc..6c6dc97 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -673,6 +673,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> }
>
> data->acpi_data = per_cpu_ptr(acpi_perf_data, cpu);
> + cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu));
This is already done by cpufreq-core before calling ->init() and so
isn't required.
> per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = data;
>
> if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
> @@ -712,6 +713,10 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> }
> #endif
>
> + for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
> + per_cpu(acfreq_data, i) = data;
> + }
> +
> /* capability check */
> if (perf->state_count <= 1) {
> pr_debug("No P-States\n");
> @@ -843,7 +848,9 @@ err_free_mask:
> free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus);
> err_free:
> kfree(data);
> - per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = NULL;
> + for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
> + per_cpu(acfreq_data, i) = NULL;
> + }
The per-cpu thing is basically wrong to start with. cpufreq-policy has
a field: 'driver_data', which can be used to replace this acfreq_data.
Probably use that and things will get fixed by themselves.
--
viresh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-03 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-03 8:01 [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: use same acpi_cpufreq_data if policy is shared Pan Xinhui
2015-07-03 8:46 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150703084657.GB23297@linux \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mnipxh@163.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=xinhuix.pan@intel.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).