From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javi Merino Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM / devfreq: Add function to set max/min frequency Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:47:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20150706084736.GA2772@e104805> References: <1435928310-15938-1-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com> <1435928310-15938-2-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.140]:46268 "EHLO cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751563AbbGFIro (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2015 04:47:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "myungjoo.ham@gmail.com" Cc: Linux PM list , =?utf-8?B?w5hyamFu?= Eide , Kyungmin Park On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 03:44:08AM +0100, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Javi Merino wro= te: > > From: =C3=98rjan Eide > > > > Factor out the logic to set minimum and maximum frequency for the d= evice > > so that it can be used by other parts of the kernel. > > > > Cc: MyungJoo Ham > > Cc: Kyungmin Park > > Signed-off-by: =C3=98rjan Eide >=20 > Dear Javi, >=20 > Is there reasons to name the function "devfreq_qos_set_[min|max]"? no= t > "devfreq_set_[min|max]"? The functions may be used by non-PM-qos > components as well (e.g., thermal). No, there are no reasons for those names. I'll rename them to devfreq_set_[min|max] > And I like the idea of using devfreq devices as cooling devices. :) Yes, we would like to be able to use them as passive cooling devices, like what we do with cpufreq for the cpus.=20 > ps. I will be on a trip starting hours later for 8 days and then in a > military training for 3 days. Please expect that my responses during > the next 11-12 days will be very slow. No worries. Thanks, Javi