From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dmaengine <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 17:05:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150706160529.GC3182@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VdGyfyfYV6q9vdqK5nYBMpPWFxr32eiXXn2ruUj4pg6BA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> >> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> []
>
> >> > > > Applied, thanks.
> >> > >
> >> > > Hmm… Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (and required
> >> > > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in
> >> > > (today's)
> >> > > linux-next.
> >> >
> >> > New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next before v4.2
> >> > -rc1 was
> >> > released (which just happened last night)?
> >>
> >> Might be, I would like to resend new version of my series and that's
> >> why I would like to have a branch to check what is already applied. So,
> >> if I can't see it does it mean it is brewed in the private repository?
> >
> > If you have patches that depend on this, they either need to come
> > through my tree, or you have to wait until the next kernel version
> > (which you probably don't want, right?).
> >
> > The alternative is that I unapply this patch and the whole lot can be
> > sucked up by the most appropriate subsystem.
>
> I resent a new version for other comments(still with all patches
> included). Meanwhile the patches 4-6 (from v4 or v5, where they are
> the same) could be applied in the first place. Can you clarify what
> exactly you have applied? The idea is to put the rest via your
> subsystem since it's most appropriate for this series.
Easiest thing for me to do is unapply.
We can take the whole series when all the Acks have been accrued.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-06 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 9:57 [PATCH v4 0/8] mfd: introduce a driver for LPSS devices on SPT Andy Shevchenko
2015-06-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose device latency tolerance to userspace Andy Shevchenko
2015-06-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] ACPI / PM: Attach ACPI power domain only once Andy Shevchenko
2015-06-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] Driver core: wakeup the parent device before trying probe Andy Shevchenko
2015-06-15 11:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] klist: implement klist_prev() Andy Shevchenko
2015-06-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] driver core: implement device_for_each_child_reverse() Andy Shevchenko
2015-06-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order Andy Shevchenko
2015-06-24 11:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-06 9:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-07-06 9:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-06 9:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-07-06 14:50 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-06 15:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-07-06 16:05 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-07-06 22:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-07 6:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-07 22:26 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-08 7:46 ` Lee Jones
2015-06-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] dmaengine: add a driver for Intel integrated DMA 64-bit Andy Shevchenko
2015-06-15 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] mfd: Add support for Intel Sunrisepoint LPSS devices Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150706160529.GC3182@x1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).