From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 07:51:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20150707065117.GE3182@x1> References: <1434362256-239992-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20150706160529.GC3182@x1> <3134535.L6At3I31FS@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3134535.L6At3I31FS@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Andy Shevchenko , Geert Uytterhoeven , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux PM list , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vinod Koul , Andrew Morton , Mika Westerberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , dmaengine , Heikki Krogerus , Jarkko Nikula , "Wysocki, Rafael J" , Mike Turquette , sboyd@codeaurora.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, July 06, 2015 05:05:29 PM Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >=20 > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones = wrote: > > > > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > >> > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > >=20 > > > [] > > >=20 > > > >> > > > Applied, thanks. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Hmm=E2=80=A6 Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied= (and required > > > >> > > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in > > > >> > > (today's) > > > >> > > linux-next. > > > >> > > > > >> > New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next befor= e v4.2 > > > >> > -rc1 was > > > >> > released (which just happened last night)? > > > >> > > > >> Might be, I would like to resend new version of my series and = that's > > > >> why I would like to have a branch to check what is already app= lied. So, > > > >> if I can't see it does it mean it is brewed in the private rep= ository? > > > > > > > > If you have patches that depend on this, they either need to co= me > > > > through my tree, or you have to wait until the next kernel vers= ion > > > > (which you probably don't want, right?). > > > > > > > > The alternative is that I unapply this patch and the whole lot = can be > > > > sucked up by the most appropriate subsystem. > > >=20 > > > I resent a new version for other comments(still with all patches > > > included). Meanwhile the patches 4-6 (from v4 or v5, where they a= re > > > the same) could be applied in the first place. Can you clarify wh= at > > > exactly you have applied? The idea is to put the rest via your > > > subsystem since it's most appropriate for this series. > >=20 > > Easiest thing for me to do is unapply. > >=20 > > We can take the whole series when all the Acks have been accrued. >=20 > So are there any ACKs missing from the last series posted by Andy? Yes, I have requested a Clk Ack, as there are some, lets say interesting code in the MFD driver which I am unsure about. However, we have caught Mike at an awkward time, as he is in the middle of transitioning jobs. Perhaps Stephen Boyd (now Cc'ed) might have a look. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html