From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] cpufreq: opp: fix handling of turbo modes Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:06:41 +0530 Message-ID: <20150727113641.GB10181@linux> References: <1436456621-29839-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <1595601.YD6UTxy5Qg@amdc1976> <20150727103521.GA4103@linux> <3141301.RS9TLygaba@amdc1976> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3141301.RS9TLygaba@amdc1976> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Thomas Abraham , Sylwester Nawrocki , Michael Turquette , Kukjin Kim , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Tomasz Figa , Lukasz Majewski , Heiko Stuebner , Chanwoo Choi , Kevin Hilman , Javier Martinez Canillas , Tobias Jakobi , Anand Moon , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 27-07-15, 13:14, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Sorry but you don't seem to understand the issue. :) No, I did. I understand that if someone uses opp bindings today with some entries as turbo OPPs, cpufreq will use them as normal frequencies. And that may harm the board. BUT, opp-v2 code isn't ready to be used yet. And platforms should see what all is implemented before trying to use them. All I was saying is, this isn't a FIX as we haven't introduced the feature yet. Otherwise I had no issues with the patch. -- viresh