From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] power: bq27xxx_battery: Fix typos and change naming for state of charge functions Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:41:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20150728084150.GE13765@pali> References: <1437601920-13045-1-git-send-email-afd@ti.com> <1437601920-13045-7-git-send-email-afd@ti.com> <20150723161534.GG29125@pali> <55B12214.7070103@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55B12214.7070103@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Andrew F. Davis" Cc: Sebastian Reichel , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , David Woodhouse , Dan Murphy , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 23 July 2015 12:19:16 Andrew F. Davis wrote: > On 07/23/2015 11:15 AM, Pali Roh=C3=A1r wrote: > > On Wednesday 22 July 2015 16:51:58 Andrew F. Davis wrote: > >> Fix typos and change "relative state of charge" to "state of charg= e" as not > >> all supported devices use relative state of charge. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis > >> --- > >> drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- > >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c b/drivers/power/bq27x= xx_battery.c > >> index f5d7a137..5686da6 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c > >> +++ b/drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c > >> @@ -231,26 +231,26 @@ static bool bq27xxx_is_chip_version_higher(s= truct bq27xxx_device_info *di) > >> } > >> =20 > >> /* > >> - * Return the battery Relative State-of-Charge > >> + * Return the battery State-of-Charge > >> * Or < 0 if something fails. > >> */ > >> -static int bq27xxx_battery_read_rsoc(struct bq27xxx_device_info *= di) > >> +static int bq27xxx_battery_read_soc(struct bq27xxx_device_info *d= i) > >> { > >> - int rsoc; > >> + int soc; > >> =20 > >> if (di->chip =3D=3D BQ27500 || di->chip =3D=3D BQ27742) > >> - rsoc =3D bq27xxx_read(di, BQ27500_REG_SOC, false); > >> + soc =3D bq27xxx_read(di, BQ27500_REG_SOC, false); > >> else if (di->chip =3D=3D BQ27510) > >> - rsoc =3D bq27xxx_read(di, BQ27510_REG_SOC, false); > >> + soc =3D bq27xxx_read(di, BQ27510_REG_SOC, false); > >> else if (di->chip =3D=3D BQ27425) > >> - rsoc =3D bq27xxx_read(di, BQ27425_REG_SOC, false); > >> + soc =3D bq27xxx_read(di, BQ27425_REG_SOC, false); > >> else > >> - rsoc =3D bq27xxx_read(di, BQ27000_REG_RSOC, true); > >> + soc =3D bq27xxx_read(di, BQ27000_REG_RSOC, true); > >> =20 > >> - if (rsoc < 0) > >> - dev_dbg(di->dev, "error reading relative State-of-Charge\n"); > >> + if (soc < 0) > >> + dev_dbg(di->dev, "error reading State-of-Charge\n"); > >> =20 > >> - return rsoc; > >> + return soc; > >> } > >> =20 > >=20 > > It is good idea to have name function name "read_soc" with descript= ion > > "Return State-of-Charge" and for some chips that function returns R= SOC > > (Relative)? For me it is quite misleading. > >=20 >=20 > Most of the chips only return one type of SOC, and the docs refer to = this > as just "State-of-Charge". The bq27000 has "Relative" and " Compensat= ed" > but we only return one (Relative). So I figured this would be the mor= e > correct way to describe the general SOC reading function even when th= e > chips may expose other types. >=20 Can you add short comment for bq27000 if-branch about it? > >> /* > >> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int bq27xxx_battery_read_charge(struct = bq27xxx_device_info *di, u8 reg) > >> } > >> =20 > >> /* > >> - * Return the battery Nominal available capaciy in =C2=B5Ah > >> + * Return the battery Nominal available capacity in =C2=B5Ah > >> * Or < 0 if something fails. > >> */ > >> static inline int bq27xxx_battery_read_nac(struct bq27xxx_device_= info *di) > >> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static int bq27xxx_battery_read_time(struct bq= 27xxx_device_info *di, u8 reg) > >> } > >> =20 > >> /* > >> - * Read a power avg register. > >> + * Read an average power register. > >> * Return < 0 if something fails. > >> */ > >> static int bq27xxx_battery_read_pwr_avg(struct bq27xxx_device_inf= o *di, u8 reg) > >> @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static void bq27xxx_battery_update(struct bq27= xxx_device_info *di) > >> cache.charge_full =3D -ENODATA; > >> cache.health =3D -ENODATA; > >> } else { > >> - cache.capacity =3D bq27xxx_battery_read_rsoc(di); > >> + cache.capacity =3D bq27xxx_battery_read_soc(di); > >> if (is_bq27742 || is_bq27510) > >> cache.time_to_empty =3D > >> bq27xxx_battery_read_time(di, > >=20 >=20 --=20 Pali Roh=C3=A1r pali.rohar@gmail.com