From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:38 +0530 Message-ID: <20150729054538.GE21493@linux> References: <1660815.CyKx9SEI9c@vostro.rjw.lan> <4080510.IQ60sVQvbL@vostro.rjw.lan> <20150727143935.GB18535@linux> <2112385.YuDJ7h1x56@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:36471 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752225AbbG2Fpo (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2015 01:45:44 -0400 Received: by pachj5 with SMTP id hj5so81752899pac.3 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 22:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2112385.YuDJ7h1x56@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Russell King On 29-07-15, 03:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The rule is supposed to be "all of the present CPUs which do not own > a policy should point to one, unless it doesn't exist". The right > approach is then to create links from them to a policy object as soon > as we create one for them. Waiting for something else to happen is just > pointless and this approach covers both the offline and online CPUs, so > I don't think that changing it would improve things really. Ack. -- viresh