From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] ARM: at91: Properly handle slow clock Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:20:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20150731102009.GH27985@piout.net> References: <1438335599-3301-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20150731115903.4ef23e83@bbrezillon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150731115903.4ef23e83@bbrezillon> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Maxime Ripard , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alessandro Zummo , Arnd Bergmann , Daniel Lezcano , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Michael Turquette , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Sebastian Reichel , Stephen Boyd , Thierry Reding , Thomas Gleixner , Wim Van Sebroeck List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 31/07/2015 at 11:59:03 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote : > I would have squashed commit 5 to 14 into a single patch, but apart > from that it looks good to me. > I wanted to clearly list were the slow clock was needed for each soc. It actually allowed me to find one that was missing. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com