From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] cpufreq: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available when boost is enabled Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 07:36:42 +0530 Message-ID: <20150808020642.GL6939@linux> References: <1438868514-8814-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <1594902.Dv5JKhve0y@amdc1976> <20150807113739.GF6939@linux> <11605783.uxKCOKbq1D@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11605783.uxKCOKbq1D@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Thomas Abraham , Sylwester Nawrocki , Michael Turquette , Kukjin Kim , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Tomasz Figa , Lukasz Majewski , Heiko Stuebner , Chanwoo Choi , Kevin Hilman , Javier Martinez Canillas , Tobias Jakobi , Anand Moon , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Javier Martinez Canillas List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 08-08-15, 00:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > > And what exactly am I supposed to do with this? > > Have a robot that will pick up all patches ACKed by you magically or what? :) That's why I have asked Bartlomiej specifically to send it separately to the pm list as a cpufreq patch. I wasn't expecting you to apply right from here. -- viresh